So we've been taking it slow over the holidays (just like the Great Opologizer). I knew Madame was gearing up for a good one after the tight whitey terrorism attempt on Christmas, and she did not disapppoint. We went to posting this afternoon, but, of course, as has become custom recently, Madame has employed the
BOTUS to give the President advanced warning before another
"BOOM! Taste my nightstick" Facebook attack!
Now, this one hurt me. Madame doesn't like it when people don't take national security seriously so she types extra hard. She started off by using the Opologizer's administration's own words against him 5 times in the first paragraph! Madame calls it like she sees it. It's terrorism, not a "man-caused disaster".
She then took the President to the woodshed on his rhetoric and his action as this whitey tighty terrorist is receiving the same rights as an American citizen--Miranda rights, a lawyer, etc . Hmm, it seems like the words that she spoke near a year and a half ago at the
RNC are ringing true when she said, " al-Qaeda terrorists still plot to cause catastrophic harm on America, and he's worried someone won't read them their rights?". Today, she says, " It simply makes no sense to treat an al-Qaeda trained operative willing to die in the course of massacring hundreds of people as a common criminal ...Giving foreign-born, foreign-trained terrorists the right to remain silent does nothing to keep Americans safe from terrorist threats". Just call her Palin the Prescient!
As always, the closing line of her post was great: "the real nature of a terrorist threat requires a commander-in-chief not a constitutional law professor". Ouch. The truth hurts, and as someone who taught Constitutional law, the President should know that the second article of the Constitution is devoted most to outlining the role of Commander-in-Chief.
